Advanced Search | Customer Care | NCIXUS Forums |
Newsletters | Contact Us | Your Account | VIEW CART  
 Welcome 
 Hot Deals 
 NCIX PC 
 Forums 
  CANADA |  USA
Hot Topics  |  Latest Postings  |  View Unreplied  |  Forum Bookmarks
Search
Hot Searches:
 
 LATEST TOPICS |  FORUMS » GENERAL DISCUSSIONS » GURU3D LEAKS RYZEN 5 DETAILS. APRIL 11 L...
Subject: Guru3D Leaks Ryzen 5 details. April 11 Launch
Share this:  
Author Date Posted Tools
Calypso Mar 15, 2017 11:48 AM Reply | Bookmark
Like | Top | Bottom

https://www.techpowerup.com/231519/amd-ryzen-5-series-lineup-leaked
Awesome.

Topic URL: http://forums.ncix.com/forums/topic.php?id=2754032

Tip Posting | My Postings () | My Reviews () | View Source
Mr. Friendly™ Mar 15, 2017 07:12 PM Reply | Bookmark
Like | Top | Bottom

nice.

any word on their power consumption? I know the 1600X is 95w while the 1500X is 65w.

Tip Posting | My Postings () | My Reviews () | View Source
Calypso Mar 17, 2017 08:24 PM Reply | Bookmark
Like | Top | Bottom

Quote: (Mr. Friendly™ @ Mar 15 2017, 07:12 PM)

any word on their power consumption?

Ok, all I know right now is? Ryzen is limited to around 4.x GHZ (4.2 is pushing it) Every 100 MGZ, over 4.0 GHZ, and it gets scary. Like a 100 xtra watta at 4.0- 4.1.

Tip Posting | My Postings () | My Reviews () | View Source
Mr. Friendly™ Mar 17, 2017 09:54 PM Reply | Bookmark
Like | Top | Bottom

yeah, Ryzen has some bugs to work out.
- 4.0ghz OC ceiling
- memory speed glitches
- incorrect temperature reporting (wonder if that has anything to do with the OC issues...some alarm goes off and interrupts)

looking forward to see how it works with RX Vega.

Tip Posting | My Postings () | My Reviews () | View Source
Calypso Mar 19, 2017 05:28 PM Reply | Bookmark
Like | Top | Bottom

Lets put some perspective on this. Not one, (1) Ryzen R3,R5, or R7?.....has been marketed at higher than 4.0 GHZ. Im thinking more and more?...its a limitation of the core (CCX) design. I've done more digging and (cant find the stupid paper)... it seems the "Zen" core is good for 3.3-3.6 GHZ.
4.2GHZ, all cores, is totally pushing to hard. Im beginning to guess 3.7-3.8, all cores might be ideal for this architecture?

Tip Posting | My Postings () | My Reviews () | View Source
Mr. Friendly™ Mar 19, 2017 05:51 PM Reply | Bookmark
Like | Top | Bottom

hmmm. well, Nehalem suffered clock speed issues, too, did it not?

Tip Posting | My Postings () | My Reviews () | View Source
Calypso Mar 20, 2017 03:37 PM Reply | Bookmark
Like | Top | Bottom

Quote: (Mr. Friendly™ @ Mar 19 2017, 05:51 PM)

Nehalem suffered clock speed issues


Nehalem was like 2009. Ancient history. What? How can you compare 2 cpu's, 8 years apart. One being 45nm and the other being 14nm. Thankfully they are worlds apart. My crap dog FX-6300 is faster than an I7 920. However, I will say 3.0 GHZ was a tough go for the I7 920.

I'm thinking, I just might wait for Zen II. My crap dog 6300 at 4.5 is still able to push my new Rx480 along quite fine. Sure, there's a bottleneck there but it ain't that bad. It is what it is?...a weak quad core equivalent that cost me $109.00, 4 years ago. I already had the water cooling, thank god.

I'm basing my assumptions on AMD significantly improving the original Bulldozer to Vishera performance, being released 1 year apart.
Reason I bought a Rx480. 9 months ago, it was a bad deal? Today? Amd, has managed to close the gap between a GTX 1060 and a 480, from 12-15% to 2%.

I rest my case.

Tip Posting | My Postings () | My Reviews () | View Source
Calypso Mar 20, 2017 03:45 PM Reply | Bookmark
Like | Top | Bottom

.....as usual. HardwareCanucks, to the rescue.
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/73945-gtx-1060-vs-rx-480-updated-review.html

Tip Posting | My Postings () | My Reviews () | View Source
Mr. Friendly™ Mar 20, 2017 04:40 PM Reply | Bookmark
Like | Top | Bottom

Cal, my comparison is that they are both first gen processors of a new, unproven and badly optimized platform.

age nor manufacturing process wasn't really being referred to.

craqzy though. 32nm and we're at 14 - 10nm manufacturing now!

Tip Posting | My Postings () | My Reviews () | View Source
Calypso Mar 21, 2017 05:51 PM Reply | Bookmark
Like | Top | Bottom

Yup. Ok, didn't mean to bash you. You are totally right. The similarities are there. That being said? AMD, is actually a little further ahead than Nehalem was.
So, Clarkdale came next the following year, or was it westmere? .....and then the "Famous Sandy Bridge".

I'm actually quite begoggled that AMD, actually pulled this off. They're like 1/50 the size of Intel, and they pulled this off. AMD, is executing very nicely right now.

Tip Posting | My Postings () | My Reviews () | View Source
Calypso Mar 21, 2017 06:12 PM Reply | Bookmark
Like | Top | Bottom

.....and right now, today?
http://fudzilla.com/news/processors/43137-intel-underestimated-zen-ryzen-threat

Tip Posting | My Postings () | My Reviews () | View Source


Call Queue
Now Serving
Closed
Avg. Response Time
Closed
Request Call Back
(Web Orders Only)

All Time Experts
1. Mr. Friendly™ (51387)
2. The Wizard (39824)
3. death_hawk™ (35144)
4. Not An Expert (26343)
5. Lance W (25246)
 
Featured Brands:
Shop by brands
Your Order Company Info Memberships Services Hotlinks
Customer Care
Order Status
About NCIX
Contact Us
Careers
Terms & Conditions
Branding & Logos
Privacy Policy
NCIX Rewards
Premier Partner Reseller
Affiliate Program
NCIX Gift Cards
Online Price Match
NCIX Newsletters
Facebook
YouTube
Twitter
Forums
International Sites: United States Canada
Copyright© 2015 - NCIXUS.com/NCIXUS Technology Inc. All rights reserved.